top of page
Premier-Law-Group-logo

✓ UK Solicitor       ✓ Qualified Polish Patent & Trademark Attorney      ✓ Direct UKIPO, EUIPO, Polish Patent Office & WIPO Representation      ✓ Offices in London & Warsaw

Why 2026 is an important year for SME intellectual property

kebindersony
Jul 6
7 min read

For many small and medium-sized businesses, intellectual property is still treated as something to deal with “later” — after the product launches, after funding is raised, or after international expansion begins.


That approach is becoming increasingly risky.


In 2026, three developments make IP protection especially important for SMEs:

  1. EU funding remains available for some IP activities, including support linked to patents and plant varieties, although some SME Fund vouchers have already been exhausted.

  2. UK intellectual property official fees increased from 1 April 2026, affecting trademarks, designs and patents.

  3. AI is creating new copyright and brand-protection risks, especially for businesses using generative AI in marketing, product development or content creation.


For SMEs planning to sell, license, franchise, fundraise or expand internationally, the question is no longer simply: “Do we need IP protection?”

The better question is:


Which IP rights should we protect first — and where will delay cost us the most?


1. Trademarks: protect the name before you build the brand

A trademark protects the commercial signs customers use to identify your business. This may include:

  • your company or product name

  • your logo

  • a slogan

  • the name of a platform, app, software product or service

  • a distinctive brand element used in trade


For SMEs, trademarks are often the most urgent IP right because the brand usually appears publicly before patents, designs or copyright strategy are considered.


Common SME trademark mistakes

Many businesses assume that:

  • registering a company name protects the brand

  • owning a domain name gives trademark rights

  • using a logo on social media is enough

  • a brand is available because no identical company appears on Google

  • protection in Poland automatically protects the UK, EU or global markets


These assumptions can be expensive.


A company name registration and a domain name do not normally provide the same protection as a registered trademark. A trademark registration gives stronger rights to stop confusingly similar names and can become a valuable commercial asset.


Practical example

Imagine a Polish SaaS company launches under a new brand name, buys the .com domain, creates a website and starts advertising in Germany, France and the UK.

Six months later, it discovers that another company already owns a similar EU trademark in the same category.


The SME may then face:

  • rebranding costs

  • lost SEO value

  • blocked marketplace listings

  • investor concerns during due diligence

  • legal costs or settlement pressure

  • inability to expand under the chosen name


Interactive check: is your brand ready to protect?

Ask yourself:

  • Is the name distinctive, or is it mainly descriptive?

  • Have you checked for similar trademarks, not only identical names?

  • Do you know which trademark classes cover your goods and services?

  • Are you planning to sell in the EU, UK, US or internationally?

  • Is the domain name aligned with the trademark strategy?

  • Is your logo worth protecting separately?


If the answer to any of these is “not sure,” a trademark clearance check should happen before major marketing spend.


2. SME Fund 2026: useful support, but timing matters


The EUIPO SME Fund 2026 is designed to help eligible SMEs reduce the cost of protecting intellectual property. The scheme can support different IP-related activities, including trademarks, designs, patents, plant varieties and IP Scan services. EUIPO states that businesses may save up to 75% on certain IP right applications and up to 90% on an IP Scan, depending on country or region.


However, SMEs should be aware that availability can change quickly. According to EUIPO’s SME Fund 2026 FAQ, Voucher 1 for IP Scans and Voucher 2 for trademarks and designs are currently unavailable for new applications because funds have been exhausted, while Voucher 3 for patents and Voucher 4 for Community Plant Varieties remain available.


What this means for SMEs

The SME Fund can be valuable, but it should not be treated as guaranteed or permanently available.

A better approach is:

  1. identify which IP rights matter most commercially

  2. check funding availability before filing

  3. apply for the voucher before making the relevant application

  4. avoid delaying urgent protection only because a voucher is temporarily unavailable


IPMeridian tip

If your brand is already public or launch is imminent, waiting too long for funding may create more risk than the reimbursement is worth. Funding should support the IP strategy — not replace it.


3. UK IP fees increased from 1 April 2026

For businesses protecting IP in the UK, costs have also changed.

The UK Intellectual Property Office confirmed that new fees for designs, trademarks and patents apply from 1 April 2026. The guidance explains how the new fees apply and reminds applicants that they are responsible for paying the correct fee.


Why this matters


For SMEs operating between the EU and UK, the UK is often still a priority market because of:

  • E-commerce activity

  • English-language branding

  • Amazon, Shopify or marketplace sales

  • UK investors or partners

  • software and digital service customers

  • licensing or distribution agreements

Since Brexit, an EU trademark no longer automatically gives new protection in the UK. Businesses often need a separate UK trademark strategy.


Practical question

If your business sells to customers in both the EU and UK, ask:

Do we have protection where our customers, competitors, distributors and online platforms actually operate?

If the answer is “EU only,” the UK may be a gap.


4. Patents: do not disclose the invention too early

Patents protect technical inventions. They can be relevant for:

  • engineering products

  • software-enabled technical solutions

  • manufacturing methods

  • medical devices

  • hardware

  • clean technology

  • AI infrastructure or data-processing inventions

  • industrial processes

For SMEs, the most dangerous patent mistake is early disclosure.


Publicly disclosing an invention before filing can damage or destroy patentability in many jurisdictions. Disclosure can happen through:

  • investor pitch decks

  • website content

  • trade fairs

  • product demos

  • public grant applications

  • academic publications

  • LinkedIn posts

  • sales presentations without confidentiality protection


Interactive check: could your invention need patent protection?

Consider these questions:

  • Does the product solve a technical problem in a new way?

  • Is there a process, mechanism or architecture competitors could copy?

  • Would investors value exclusivity?

  • Are you planning to license the technology?

  • Is the invention being shown to customers or partners?

  • Has anything already been published?

If yes, speak to a patent professional before public disclosure.


5. Unitary Patent: a more efficient option for some European patent strategies

The European patent system now includes the Unitary Patent route. According to the European Patent Office, EU-based SMEs and other eligible organisations may also benefit from a compensation scheme for translation costs where the patent application was filed in an official EU language other than English, French or German.


The EPO’s April 2026 Unitary Patent Guidelines entered into force on 1 April 2026, replacing the April 2025 edition.


Why SMEs should care

For the right business, the Unitary Patent can simplify protection across participating EU countries. However, it is not automatically the right choice in every case.

Factors to consider include:

  • where the invention will be commercialised

  • where competitors manufacture or sell

  • enforcement strategy

  • budget

  • licensing plans

  • whether national validation may still be better in selected countries

A patent strategy should be commercial, not just procedural.


6. Copyright and AI: new risks for marketing, software and content-heavy businesses

Copyright protects original creative works such as:

  • website text

  • software code

  • images

  • videos

  • product manuals

  • training materials

  • marketing content

  • databases in some cases

  • artistic and design assets

For many SMEs, copyright has become more complex because of generative AI.


Businesses now commonly use AI tools to create:

  • blog posts

  • product descriptions

  • images

  • adverts

  • software snippets

  • pitch decks

  • website copy

  • social media campaigns


This creates practical questions:

  • Who owns the output?

  • Was third-party material used?

  • Can the content be registered or enforced?

  • Are there licensing restrictions in the AI tool terms?

  • Has confidential business data been entered into an AI system?

  • Could the output be too similar to existing content?


European Parliament research has highlighted that generative AI is changing how content is processed and distributed across the EU, and that copyright eligibility of AI-generated outputs remains a key issue under EU law.


Practical SME policy

Every SME using AI for business content should have a simple internal rulebook:

  • do not upload confidential inventions into public AI tools

  • review AI-generated text before publication

  • keep records of human contribution

  • check images before commercial use

  • avoid copying competitor content through AI prompts

  • use licensed brand assets

  • clarify ownership with freelancers and agencies


7. IP and funding: investors look for ownership, not just ideas

SME funding is not only about revenue, traction or pitch quality. Investors also want to know whether the business actually owns what it is selling.


During due diligence, IP issues can reduce valuation or delay investment if:

  • the trademark is not registered

  • the founder does not own the logo or website content

  • software was developed without proper assignment agreements

  • inventions were disclosed before patent filing

  • open-source software obligations are unclear

  • freelance contracts do not transfer IP rights

  • the brand conflicts with an earlier right

  • protection is missing in key markets


Investor-readiness checklist

Before fundraising, SMEs should review:

  • trademark registrations and pending applications

  • ownership of domain names

  • copyright assignments from designers, developers and agencies

  • patent filing status

  • confidentiality agreements

  • licensing arrangements

  • shareholder or founder IP assignment documents

  • open-source software usage

  • brand clearance in target markets

Strong IP does not guarantee funding. But weak IP can create avoidable friction.


8. What should SMEs protect first?

There is no single answer, but a practical priority order often looks like this:

If you are launching a brand

Start with trademark clearance and filing.

If you are building technology

Review patentability before disclosure.

If you are creating content, software or creative assets

Check copyright ownership and contracts.

If you are expanding internationally

Map protection by market, not by assumption.

If you are preparing for funding

Create an IP ownership file before investor due diligence.

If you are using AI

Introduce a copyright and confidentiality policy.


9. A simple 30-minute IP audit for SMEs

Use the questions below as a quick internal review.

Brand

  • What brand names are currently public?

  • Are they registered as trademarks?

  • In which countries?

  • In which classes?

  • Are similar names already registered?

Technology

  • Have we created anything technically new?

  • Has it been disclosed publicly?

  • Do we have confidentiality agreements in place?

  • Should we consider patent protection?

Copyright

  • Who created our website, logo, photos, code and content?

  • Do our contracts assign ownership to the company?

  • Are we using licensed images and software?

  • Are we using AI-generated content commercially?

Funding and growth

  • Would an investor see clear IP ownership?

  • Are there gaps in our most important markets?

  • Could a competitor copy our name, product or content?

  • Are grants or SME funding options available?

If this review raises concerns, the next step is not panic. It is prioritisation.


Conclusion: IP protection is a growth tool, not just a legal formality

For SMEs, intellectual property is not only about preventing disputes. It is about building a business that can grow with confidence.

A clear IP strategy can help you:

  • protect your brand

  • reduce copycat risk

  • support investor confidence

  • improve licensing options

  • enter new markets

  • defend digital assets

  • use funding more effectively

  • avoid expensive rebranding or legal disputes

In 2026, with changing UK fees, evolving EU funding availability and growing AI-related copyright risk, SMEs should review their IP position earlier rather than later.


Need help reviewing your IP position?

IPMeridian supports businesses with trademark, copyright, patent and IP strategy matters across Europe, the UK and international markets.

 

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page